Much has been discussed about the effect that the proposed tax-cut compromise between President Obama and Congressional Republicans would have on long-term debt and much has been discussed about how many jobs the proposed agreement would generate and when. Overall, although it would reduce the money withheld from an average American's paycheck in 2011, it ultimately would increase the burden shifted onto that average American's back for funding our government. Probably the greatest damaging effect, though, would result from the 2 percent reduction in payroll tax, an ingredient injected late in the negotiations last week.
The provision puts in jeopardy the long-term survival of Social Security - a centerpiece program that has been popular, efficient, and effective for 75 years. Sixty-four percent of seniors - nearly 22 million Americans - depend on Social Security for most of their livelihood. In 1935 most seniors lived below the poverty line, a fact hard to believe since Social Security has changed that. Also 16 million others - not in their retirement years - surviving spouses and children and people with disabilities depend on Social Security.
Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ), the former chairman of the Select Intelligence Oversight Panel, said he is troubled by Rep. Peter King's (R-NY) plan to hold hearings on the radicalization of Muslim-Americans.
"I feel like my friend Peter has gone way beyond what is called for there, and I do intend to talk to him about it," Holt told TPM of King's plan.
Holt's comments to TPM came after a Brennan Center panel held Tuesday to release the center's comprehensive study of the rules that govern the FBI's authority over domestic intelligence. The rules, approved by former Attorney General Michael Mukasey in 2008, are considerably more lax than previous incarnations, vastly expand the FBI's investigatory discretion and limit oversight, the report argues.
Emily Berman, the author of the Brennan Center report, recommends that the FBI be banned from using certain investigative techniques unless there is some basis in fact to suspect wrongdoing; that agents be required to use the least intrusive investigative technique that is likely to prove effective; and that agents be banned from improperly considering race, religion, ethnicity, national origin or First-Amendment-protected activity in investigative decisions.
Holt told the audience that profiling is "lazy thinking" and mentioned that many provisions of the Patriot Act are up for renewal next month
2 comments:
Holt's reputation in NJ-12 is actually on a serious downer after running a very dishonest gutter campaign against a centrist Republican in a race that saw his margin of victory cut by over 30% to less than 7% in 2010. He now sits as the lowest margin of victory of any Dem. incumbent in the state and will likely lose his seat after redistricting in 2012.
Oh Anonymous, just because you say things assertively doesn't make them so. Holt is a centrist democrat who won by 7 points in a district that is not one of NJ's bastions for democrats. He did this in a year of anti-incumbent and anti-democrat tides because of a poor economy. Any how will he loste his seat through redistricting? Why would you assume that the state legislature - in which the dems hold large majorities in both chambers - would target the seat that you describe they hold the most tenuous grip on?
Post a Comment