Now, we have evidence that the Republicans never had a plan to actually reduce spending:
It was hypothetical? I don't remember hearing that word during the campaign or any tea party rally. Funny timing.Many people knowledgeable about the federal budget said House Republicans could not keep their campaign promise to cut $100 billion from domestic spending in a single year. Now it appears that Republicans agree.
Now aides say that the $100 billion figure was hypothetical, and that the objective is to get annual spending for programs other than those for the military, veterans and domestic security back to the levels of 2008, before Democrats approved stimulus spending to end the recession.
3 comments:
I don't know what the republicans intend to do, now that they have their tea party pit bulls in congress. I believe Mitch McConnell in one honest moment put it best:
""The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."
There's a big difference between campaigning and actually governing.
I know; but he said this after the election as well at the Heritage Foundation.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2010/11/04/131069048/sen-mcconnell-insists-one-term-for-obama
Here's an article from the Christian Science Monitor that might be of interest.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/0104/Five-ways-Republicans-will-change-the-House/Focus-on-the-Constitution
Post a Comment